United Kingdom2613 days leftOpen

The City of Liverpool College - Dynamic Purchasing System - Adult Education Budget (Liverpool City Region)

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Merseyside, United Kingdom

VALUE

£12,500,000

DEADLINE

March 30, 2033 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

80400000

REFERENCE

009430-2023

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The City of Liverpool College intends to create a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for training delivery partners for the Liverpool City Region. This provision qualifies under the Light Touch Regime. The College has opted to establish a DPS as it is deemed the most appropriate option to meet Its requirements and will enable a clear, consistent, and compliant route to market. The DPS will be open to new entrants throughout its lifespan (10 years). This is a two-stage procurement process, the first stage will involve an assessment of suitability and capability to join the Framework. The estimated contract value is the estimated value over the 10 year period based on the current annual value. Any contract awarded as a result of this process would be for an initial 12 month period.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Must be a training delivery partner.
  • Must be able to deliver Adult Education Budget (AEB) training.
  • Must be able to deliver training within the Liverpool City Region.
  • Must be able to join a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
  • Must be able to participate in a two-stage procurement process.
  • Must be able to meet suitability and capability criteria to join the framework.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Capability to deliver Adult Education Budget (AEB) training.
  • Capability to operate as a training delivery partner within a DPS framework.
  • Capability to deliver training within the Liverpool City Region.
  • Capability to meet the requirements of the Light Touch Regime.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial thresholds (e.g., minimum annual turnover, specific guarantees) are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submission for a two-stage procurement process.
  • Submission for an assessment of suitability and capability to join the Framework (Stage 1).
  • Submission must be made by the deadline: 2033-03-30 11:00:00.
  • Submissions will be for a DPS that is open to new entrants throughout its 10-year lifespan.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF009430-2023_official.pdf
Summary:
The City of Liverpool College is establishing a 10-year Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Adult Education Budget training delivery partners in the Liverpool City Region, involving a two-stage suitability and capability assessment to join the framework.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for adult education, offering flexibility and market access, but critically lacks detailed documentation, specific requirements, and evaluation criteria, hindering fair and transparent participation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The use of a DPS under the Light Touch Regime is a legally compliant procurement approach for this type of service. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided information is a significant legal compliance risk.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100

While the overall concept of the DPS and its purpose is clear, the specific requirements for suitability and capability are vague and lack detail. Bidders cannot understand what is truly expected without further documentation.

Vague suitability and capability requirements
Lack of detailed criteria for assessment
Completeness83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Crucial elements such as full tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

No tender documents attached
Missing detailed eligibility and technical requirements
Fairness80/100

The DPS structure, being open to new entrants throughout its lifespan, promotes fairness and broad market access. However, the critical absence of detailed suitability, capability, and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining fairness.

Risk of subjective assessment due to missing detailed evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

The DPS model is practical for the College's long-term needs. However, from a bidder's perspective, preparing a meaningful submission is impractical without access to comprehensive tender documents and clear, detailed requirements.

Impractical for bidders to prepare submissions without full documentation
Data Consistency100/100

The provided data points (e.g., 10-year duration, estimated value over 10 years) are consistent with each other and the DPS model.

Sustainability0/100

The provided information does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, which are increasingly important aspects of modern public procurement.

Absence of sustainability criteria
Absence of social criteria

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for flexibility and continuous market access.
DPS is open to new entrants throughout its 10-year lifespan, promoting competition.
Clear description of the procurement approach and contract duration.
Estimated contract value is disclosed.

Concerns

Critical absence of comprehensive tender documents and detailed requirements.
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial thresholds.
Lack of explicit and detailed evaluation criteria for suitability and capability.
Risk of subjective assessment due to vague requirements.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed requirements, specific exclusion grounds, and clear evaluation criteria.
2. Provide explicit and measurable suitability and capability criteria for Stage 1 assessment.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, and innovation objectives into the procurement process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
70/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes