Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the absence of a reveal date makes it impossible to verify compliance with minimum notice periods, which is a minor legal compliance concern regarding mandatory disclosure.
•Missing reveal date for the tender
Clarity60/100
While the tender description is detailed regarding lots, service levels, and call-off procedures, the crucial omission of specific evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for suppliers on how their bids will be assessed and ranked.
•Missing specific evaluation criteria
Completeness65/100
The tender provides most essential information, including basic details, financial estimates, duration, and attached documents. However, the lack of defined evaluation criteria represents a significant gap in the overall completeness of the tender documentation.
•Missing specific evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100
The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the selection process, raising significant fairness concerns, especially regarding the direct award mechanisms.
•Missing specific evaluation criteria, impacting objectivity and transparency
Practicality90/100
The tender excels in practicality, supporting electronic submission via a dedicated portal, providing clear document URLs, and specifying key dates (contract start, duration) and financial information.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and coherent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a well-structured and reliable data set.
Sustainability90/100
The tender demonstrates an excellent commitment to sustainability and innovation, explicitly incorporating net-zero energy solutions, renewable energy, PPAs, demand-side response, and innovation services across its lots.