Tenders

Tarmac Patch Repairs to Car Parks & Footpaths 2026 – 2029

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
011929-2026
Value
£126,000
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£126,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Kent
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tarmac Patch Repairs to Car Parks & Footpaths in the Dover District Area 2026 – 2029. For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at: https://www.kentbusinessportal.org.uk/tenders/UK-UK-Dover:-Tarmac./EFQ45393DZ To respond to this opportunity, please click here: https://www.kentbusinessportal.org.uk/respond/EFQ45393DZ

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not explicitly stated in the provided tender notice summaries. Bidders should refer to the full tender documents on the Kent Business Portal/Delta eSourcing for specific mandatory exclusion criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
011929-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about the tender for tarmac patch repairs to car parks and footpaths in the Dover District from 2026 to 2029, offering transparency on the procurement process.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011929-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package contains structured, machine-readable data detailing the tender for tarmac patch repairs by Dover District Council, including buyer information and legal basis.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011929-2026_official.pdf

Dover District Council is seeking contractors for tarmac patch repairs to car parks and footpaths from 2026-2029, with an estimated budget of £126,000, evaluated solely on price, and open to SMEs.

Tender NoticeHTM
011929-2026.html

This tender notice from Dover District Council invites bids for tarmac patch repairs to car parks and footpaths in the Dover District Area from 2026 to 2029, with an estimated value of £126,000 and a 100% price-based award criterion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a clear service description and objective evaluation criteria, but its summary lacks detailed requirements, necessitating external document review for full information. Overall, it's a functional tender with some areas for improved transparency and detail in the initial overview.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and no disputes are reported. It appears to comply with national regulations for below-threshold tenders. However, there is a minor inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the stated value, and mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the summary.

"Value Classified: Yes" contradicts stated value
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly detailed in summary
Clarity80/100

The service description is clear and unambiguous. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as '100% price-based' in the document summaries. However, the AI-extracted requirements are sparse, and other detailed requirements are not summarized, necessitating access to external documents for a full understanding.

AI-extracted requirements are not comprehensive
Detailed requirements not in summary
Completeness70/100

All essential basic information (title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, location) is provided. Documents are attached and linked. The main area for improvement is the lack of detailed requirements and performance conditions within the provided summary, requiring external document review.

Detailed requirements and performance conditions not summarized
Fairness85/100

Full document access is provided via external links. The estimated value is disclosed. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (100% price). E-procurement is enabled. The requirements appear generic and not tailored, with an explicit mention of being open to SMEs.

"Value Classified: Yes" is a minor data inconsistency
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and document URLs are clearly provided. The contract start date and duration are known. While the technical means for participation are practical, the limited detail in the AI-extracted requirements and summary means bidders must navigate to external portals for fundamental information, reducing the practicality of the initial overview.

Limited detail in AI-extracted requirements and summary necessitates immediate external navigation for core information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside the disclosed estimated value.

"Value Classified: Yes" alongside disclosed value
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. Given the nature of the contract (tarmac repairs), this is not uncommon, but it also means no specific sustainability efforts are highlighted or required. A neutral score reflects this absence rather than active disregard.

No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear service description and objective evaluation criteria (100% price)
Full document access and e-procurement enabled via external portal
All essential basic information (dates, value, duration, location) is provided
Open to SMEs, promoting broader participation
Data is largely consistent with no disputes

Concerns

AI-extracted requirements are very sparse, requiring immediate navigation to external links for details
"Value Classified: Yes" contradicts the stated estimated value, creating a minor data inconsistency
Lack of explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Detailed requirements and performance conditions are not summarized in the provided overview
The 'Missing reveal date' means the full publication period cannot be verified

Recommendations

1. Enhance the AI-extracted requirements to provide a more comprehensive summary of key tender conditions and requirements directly within the initial overview.
2. Clarify or remove the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag when the estimated value is explicitly stated to avoid confusion.
3. Consider incorporating and explicitly stating relevant sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, even for routine contracts, where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline