York College: The Provision of Snacks & Soft Drinks Products

This tender provides basic information but lacks critical detail in its summary regarding specific requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting clarity and completeness. The absence of e-submission and sustainability considerations are notable drawbacks.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the provided summaries lack specific details on mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds, which are crucial for legal compliance assessment. The missing reveal date also hinders a full evaluation of the reasonableness of the tender period.

While the general description of the procurement is clear, the AI-extracted requirements repeatedly state that specific details for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not detailed in the provided summaries. Crucially, evaluation criteria are not specified, significantly reducing the clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the tender summaries are significantly incomplete regarding the substantive content of the requirements. Critical details for mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as evaluation criteria, are explicitly stated as missing from the provided summaries.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, as far as provided, appear generic and not tailored. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission capabilities significantly reduce transparency and equal access for all potential bidders, impacting overall fairness.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

All key fields are populated, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data integrity for the available information.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives.