Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service

This tender for an Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service demonstrates good clarity in its service description and supports electronic submission, but suffers from significant gaps in transparency and completeness, notably the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed value.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, making it impossible to assess the reasonableness of the submission period from the tender's perspective. Furthermore, the summaries lack specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements, which are standard legal components.

The service description and aims are clear and unambiguous. However, a critical deficiency is the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria, which significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how proposals will be judged. Performance conditions are also not clearly detailed in the summaries.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed and classified. Crucially, evaluation criteria are missing, and mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements are not detailed in the summaries. The provided documents appear to be administrative rather than comprehensive tender specifications.

Electronic submission is supported, promoting equal access. However, the classified value reduces transparency for bidders. The missing reveal date prevents assessment of adequate preparation time. Most critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the procurement process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.

Electronic submission via the In-Tend portal is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, a direct URL to the tender documents is not explicitly provided, and the undisclosed estimated value can make it challenging for bidders to assess the financial scope and plan resources effectively.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent (submission before start, duration clear). There are no disputes or suspensions. However, some fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type (Code)', and 'Procedure (Code)' are empty, and the tender reveal date is missing, indicating minor data gaps.

The service's core aims to enhance health, empower residents, and reduce health inequalities inherently address significant social aspects. However, the tender does not explicitly include green procurement criteria, an innovation focus, or specific social criteria beyond the service's fundamental purpose.