Dorset and Somerset, United Kingdom
£420,000
February 25, 2026 at 12:00
Other
004526-2026
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for a Project Portfolio Management System demonstrates good basic information and clear evaluation weightings, but suffers from significant gaps in detailed criteria, transparency, and modern procurement practices.
The tender correctly defines the open procedure and CPV codes. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and a missing reveal date are minor compliance issues. A notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs GBP).
While the overall description and evaluation weightings (Quality 60%, Price 30%, Social Value 10%) are clear, the tender lacks detailed evaluation criteria for 'quality' and 'social value', making it difficult for bidders to understand specific expectations.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and a lack of clarity on whether the full tender specifications are adequately summarized or available.
The tender's fairness is compromised by the lack of detailed and objective evaluation criteria, which reduces transparency. The absence of electronic submission support also presents a potential barrier to equal access for all bidders.
The tender lacks practicality due to the absence of electronic submission support, which is a significant drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, which could complicate access for potential bidders.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs GBP). A minor inconsistency exists regarding the 'Liable Person' field being empty and a conflict on social criteria between AI-extracted requirements and automated checks.
The tender includes a positive aspect by allocating 10% of the evaluation to social value. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or an innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability profile.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes