United Kingdom23 days leftOpen

Provision of Project Portfolio Management System

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Dorset and Somerset, United Kingdom

VALUE

£420,000

DEADLINE

February 25, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

72222300

REFERENCE

004526-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Provision of Project Portfolio Management System for Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided summaries.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be capable of providing Information Technology services, specifically a Project Portfolio Management System.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Propose a Project Portfolio Management System.
  • Demonstrate the quality of the proposed system and services, as quality accounts for 60% of the evaluation.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a competitive price for the provision of the Project Portfolio Management System, as price accounts for 30% of the evaluation.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the tender by the deadline of 2026-02-25 at 12:00:00 UTC.
  • Address the quality aspects of the proposed solution in the submission.
  • Provide a pricing proposal for the Project Portfolio Management System.
  • Include information on social value, as it accounts for 10% of the evaluation.
  • Participate in an Open procurement procedure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data004526-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured, open contracting data detailing the Somerset NHS Foundation Trust's tender for a Project Portfolio Management System, including buyer information and key tender dates.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data004526-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the tender for a Project Portfolio Management System by Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, outlining the buyer and basic tender information.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents004526-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust is seeking a Project Portfolio Management System with an estimated value of £350,000, requiring submissions by 25 February 2026, evaluated on 60% quality and 30% price.
HTM
Tender Notice
General Information004526-2026.html
Summary:
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust is seeking a Project Portfolio Management System via an Open procedure, with an estimated value of £350,000, and tenders due by 25 February 2026, evaluated on quality (60%), price (30%), and social value (10%).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Project Portfolio Management System demonstrates good basic information and clear evaluation weightings, but suffers from significant gaps in detailed criteria, transparency, and modern procurement practices.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender correctly defines the open procedure and CPV codes. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and a missing reveal date are minor compliance issues. A notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs GBP).

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated in summaries
Missing reveal date
Clarity60/100

While the overall description and evaluation weightings (Quality 60%, Price 30%, Social Value 10%) are clear, the tender lacks detailed evaluation criteria for 'quality' and 'social value', making it difficult for bidders to understand specific expectations.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for 'quality' and 'social value'
Performance conditions not clearly stated
Completeness65/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and a lack of clarity on whether the full tender specifications are adequately summarized or available.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria for weighted aspects
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated
Fairness60/100

The tender's fairness is compromised by the lack of detailed and objective evaluation criteria, which reduces transparency. The absence of electronic submission support also presents a potential barrier to equal access for all bidders.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria impacts objectivity and transparency
No electronic submission support, potentially hindering equal access
Practicality55/100

The tender lacks practicality due to the absence of electronic submission support, which is a significant drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, which could complicate access for potential bidders.

No electronic submission supported
Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (EUR vs GBP). A minor inconsistency exists regarding the 'Liable Person' field being empty and a conflict on social criteria between AI-extracted requirements and automated checks.

Estimated value currency inconsistency (EUR vs GBP)
Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability60/100

The tender includes a positive aspect by allocating 10% of the evaluation to social value. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or an innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability profile.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No innovation focus

Strengths

Clear overall description and purpose of the procurement
Evaluation weightings (Quality, Price, Social Value) are specified
Estimated value, duration, and contract start date are provided
CPV code is correctly assigned and relevant
Inclusion of social value as an evaluation criterion

Concerns

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for quality and social value
Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary
Inconsistency in estimated value currency (EUR vs GBP)
No electronic submission support, hindering efficiency and access
Unclear if full detailed tender specifications are readily available or fully summarized

Recommendations

1. Provide comprehensive and detailed evaluation criteria for all weighted aspects (quality, social value) to ensure transparency and objectivity.
2. Clarify the full tender documentation access, ideally providing a direct URL, and implement an e-submission platform for enhanced practicality and fairness.
3. Rectify the currency inconsistency for the estimated value and explicitly state all mandatory exclusion grounds for improved legal compliance and clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
64/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes