Simplified renovation of room groups (sanitary facilities and dishwashing areas) at PII “Dzintariņš” at Dzintaru Street 90, Liepāja - Phase 1

This tender for renovation works demonstrates good clarity and legal compliance in its documentation, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and inconsistencies regarding e-submission, impacting fairness and practicality.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, uses an appropriate CPV code, and specifies reasonable deadlines. The WTO/GPA characteristic indicates broader compliance. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for full legal compliance and transparency.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referencing specific documents for details. Evaluation criteria based on the lowest price are explicitly stated, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the flagged 'Restricted document access' severely limits the completeness of information available to potential bidders.

The tender benefits from an objective 'lowest price' evaluation criterion and the stated 'E-Procurement' characteristic (though contradicted). However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical impediment to fairness, as it prevents equal access to essential information for all bidders. The undisclosed estimated value also impacts fair assessment.

The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' creates significant practical uncertainty. The lack of an estimated value and explicit document URL further reduces practicality for bidders.

Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' issue. The undisclosed estimated value also represents a missing key field.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU-funded.