Legal Compliance100/100
The provided tender information explicitly states the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds. This is a fundamental omission for a public procurement process, as these grounds are essential for ensuring ethical and compliant bidding practices.
•Absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided tender information.
Clarity40/100
The service description and overall objectives are clearly articulated. However, some technical requirements, such as 'robust approach to delivery' and 'fulfil the role of a system leader,' lack specific, measurable criteria for evaluation, which could lead to subjective assessment.
•Lack of specific measurable criteria for some technical requirements (e.g., 'robust approach,' 'system leader').
Completeness83/100
The tender information is severely incomplete. Crucially, there are no attached documents, full specifications, terms and conditions, or annexes available. Furthermore, detailed evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements for bidders (e.g., turnover, financial stability) are missing, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.
•Absence of full tender documents and detailed specifications.
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The technical capability requirements, particularly 'proven experience of: Good working knowledge of Tameside' and 'Good working knowledge of the third sector in Tameside,' are highly specific to the local area. While local knowledge is beneficial, making it a mandatory 'proven experience' requirement may unduly restrict competition, potentially favoring incumbent providers or local organizations and thus tailoring the tender for a specific type of entity.
•Technical requirements regarding 'proven experience' and 'good working knowledge of Tameside' are highly specific and may unduly restrict competition, potentially tailoring the tender for local or incumbent providers.
Practicality40/100
Without access to full tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, and financial requirements, it is impractical for potential bidders to fully understand the scope, risks, and expectations. This significantly hinders their ability to prepare a competitive and compliant bid within the given timeframe.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive bid without access to full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent, with no apparent contradictions.
Sustainability25/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is appropriate for the service. However, there is no mention of environmental or broader economic sustainability aspects beyond the social focus.
•Limited scope of sustainability criteria, focusing solely on social aspects without explicit mention of environmental or broader economic sustainability.