Legal Compliance100/100
As a below-threshold procedure, national procurement rules would apply. The 'UK-based' and 'UKAS Accreditation' requirements, while potentially permissible under national rules, significantly restrict competition. The lack of full tender documents makes a comprehensive legal compliance assessment challenging.
•Potential restriction of competition due to specific accreditation and location requirements.
•Incomplete legal framework due to missing tender documents.
Clarity40/100
Clarity is extremely poor due to the complete absence of tender documents. Bidders lack essential information regarding the scope of work, terms and conditions, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria.
•No tender documents provided.
•Missing detailed scope of work.
Completeness83/100
The tender is highly incomplete. Critical information such as full tender documents, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and comprehensive submission instructions are entirely missing.
•Complete absence of tender documents.
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness60/100
Fairness is significantly compromised. The absence of evaluation criteria means bidders cannot understand how their offers will be judged. The restrictive eligibility requirements ('UKAS Accreditation', 'UK-based') limit the pool of potential suppliers, potentially favoring a narrow segment of the market.
•Absence of evaluation criteria.
•Restrictive eligibility requirements (UKAS Accreditation, UK-based) limiting competition.
Practicality40/100
It is highly impractical for potential suppliers to prepare a meaningful bid without any tender documents, detailed requirements, or evaluation criteria. This will likely deter qualified bidders and lead to non-compliant submissions.
•Impossibility for bidders to prepare compliant offers without tender documents.
•High risk of low bidder participation or non-compliant bids.
Data Consistency100/100
The limited data provided is consistent within itself. However, the lack of comprehensive documentation prevents a thorough check for consistency across all tender aspects.
Sustainability0/100
No sustainability criteria (environmental, social, or innovation) are mentioned or requested in the provided information.
•Absence of sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).