Healthy Schools, Healthy Early Years and Domestic Abuse Prevention

This tender presents a clear service description and technical requirements, but its overall quality is significantly hampered by critical omissions such as evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and there are no disputes. However, the AI summary explicitly states a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental legal components. The missing reveal date also hinders full compliance assessment.

The service description and technical capability requirements are clear and well-articulated. Nevertheless, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and explicit financial requirements creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds in the AI summary.

The tender value is disclosed, and technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and fairness. The lack of e-submission also creates an unequal playing field, and the missing reveal date prevents assessment of reasonable preparation time.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support and a direct document URL reduces the practicality and ease of participation for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field, empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', and a slight discrepancy between the estimated value in the basic information (EUR) and the value stated in Document 1 (GBP converted to EUR).

While the service itself addresses significant social issues, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, broader social criteria (beyond the service's core), or innovation focus into the procurement process itself, which is a missed opportunity for modern public procurement.