Provision of an Estates Master Plan

This tender for an Estates Master Plan demonstrates good clarity on project scope and timeline, but is significantly hampered by the undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and the submission deadline provides a reasonable timeframe. However, the classified estimated value and the lack of specified evaluation criteria represent notable disclosure deficiencies.

The project description, purpose, and key performance dates (draft submissions) are clearly articulated. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and comprehensive financial/exclusion grounds within the provided text, relying on external documents, reduces overall clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender lacks a disclosed estimated value and, critically, evaluation criteria. The full tender documents are also external, meaning the provided summary is not fully comprehensive.

The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermine the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. While e-procurement is supported and requirements appear generic, these omissions create an uneven playing field.

Electronic submission is supported via a provided URL, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The primary practical drawback is the lack of explicit financing information due to the classified value.

The tender data is largely consistent, with logical dates for submission, contract start, and draft reports aligning with the contract duration. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are unpopulated, but do not impact overall consistency significantly.

The tender explicitly mentions 'sustainability goals' as an alignment factor for the Estates Master Plan, indicating an indirect consideration. However, it lacks explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender requirements themselves.