United Kingdom2 days leftOpen

Employee Health and Wellbeing Cash Plan

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

ONWARD GROUP LIMITED

LOCATION

North West England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£720,000

DEADLINE

February 04, 2026 at 17:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

66510000

REFERENCE

002032-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Provision of a corporate funded cash plan for Employee Health and Wellbeing
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are identifiable from the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must be legally established and authorized to provide insurance services.
  • Bidder must be eligible to contract with ONWARD GROUP LIMITED.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must demonstrate technical capability and experience in providing corporate funded cash plans for employee health and wellbeing.
  • Bidder must demonstrate the capacity to deliver and manage the service for a 36-month contract duration.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidder must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to deliver a contract with an estimated value of up to 720,000 EUR over 36 months.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bid must be submitted by 2026-02-04 17:00:00.
  • Bid must be submitted via the designated submission portal.
  • Bid must clearly address both price and quality aspects, as they will be evaluated on a 50/50 basis.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002032-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a tender notice from ONWARD GROUP LIMITED for a corporate Employee Health and Wellbeing Cash Plan, detailing the scope, estimated value (£576,000-£720,000), key deadlines, submission portal, and 50/50 price/quality award criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of tender documents, which severely hinders bidders' ability to submit a meaningful proposal. The provided information is too high-level to ensure a transparent and fair procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Basic legal compliance elements, such as bidder establishment and authorization for insurance services, are mentioned. However, the lack of actual tender documents makes it impossible to verify full compliance with procurement regulations, particularly regarding the detailed application of mandatory exclusion grounds.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are identifiable from the provided information, which should typically be clearly stated or referenced in tender documentation.
Clarity40/100

The extracted requirements are clear in their high-level statements. However, the absence of any tender documents means that bidders lack crucial clarity regarding the detailed scope of service, technical specifications, evaluation methodology, and contractual terms.

No documents attached and no document content available, making it impossible for bidders to understand the full scope and detailed requirements.
Completeness83/100

The provided tender information is significantly incomplete. Key elements such as detailed technical specifications, comprehensive evaluation criteria (beyond the 50/50 price/quality split), full contract terms, and detailed instructions for bidders are entirely missing.

No documents attached and no document content available, rendering the tender fundamentally incomplete.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for the 'quality' aspect.
Fairness60/100

The high-level eligibility and technical/financial requirements appear generic. However, the critical absence of detailed specifications and specific evaluation criteria raises significant concerns about potential subjectivity in the evaluation process and the risk of requirements being implicitly tailored, even if not explicitly visible from the limited data.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria, which compromises the fairness and objectivity of the evaluation process.
Practicality40/100

It would be highly impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and competitive bid based solely on the provided summary and extracted requirements. They lack the necessary detailed information to understand the service scope, technical specifications, and specific deliverables.

No documents attached and no document content available, making it practically impossible for bidders to formulate an informed response.
Data Consistency100/100

The limited data provided appears consistent within itself (e.g., contract duration aligns with estimated value). However, the absence of full documentation prevents a thorough check for consistency across different parts of the tender.

Sustainability0/100

There is no mention of environmental, social, or innovation aspects in the provided information or extracted requirements, indicating a lack of focus on broader sustainability goals.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title, reference number, organization, and description provided.
Open procedure, promoting broad competition.
Estimated value and contract duration are specified.
Evaluation split (50/50 price/quality) is stated, indicating a focus beyond just price.

Concerns

Critical absence of any tender documents, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a proper submission.
Lack of detailed and objective evaluation criteria for the 'quality' aspect.
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are identifiable, which should be clearly outlined.
High-level requirements lack specificity, potentially leading to subjective interpretation and evaluation.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all necessary tender documents, including detailed specifications, draft contract, and comprehensive evaluation criteria.
2. Clearly define and detail all mandatory exclusion grounds and selection criteria in accordance with procurement regulations.
3. Provide specific, objective, and measurable evaluation criteria for the 'quality' aspect to ensure a fair and transparent assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
67/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes