Legal Compliance75/100
As a pre-market engagement notice in 'planning' status, the absence of a defined 'Type' or 'Procedure' is acceptable at this preliminary stage. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. However, the 'Liable Person' is not specified, and the explicit mention of relevant national procurement regulations is missing, which would be essential for a formal tender.
•Missing liable person
•No explicit mention of national procurement regulations
Clarity80/100
The description is highly detailed and unambiguous, clearly outlining the Trust's needs, current environment, and desired system functionalities. The AI-extracted technical requirements are comprehensive and well-articulated. While evaluation criteria are not specified, this is expected for a pre-market engagement focused on information gathering.
•No evaluation criteria specified (expected for pre-market engagement)
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, and timeline are adequately provided. Requirements are well-defined. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are empty, and the 'Liable Person' is missing. A significant concern is the failure to download the 'Official PDF Version,' which impacts the completeness of accessible documentation.
•Missing procedure type
•Missing liable person
Fairness65/100
The estimated value is disclosed, which promotes transparency. However, the lack of e-submission capabilities is a significant barrier to equal access for all potential bidders. The absence of evaluation criteria, while typical for pre-market engagement, would be a major fairness concern in a formal tender. The requirement for IMP integration is specific but a legitimate functional need, not necessarily indicative of tailoring.
•No e-submission
•Failed document download
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and the estimated value is provided. However, the lack of electronic submission support creates a practical hurdle for bidders. The failure to download the 'Official PDF Version' also poses a practical challenge for accessing complete information.
•No electronic submission support
•Failed download of official PDF document
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, timeline, CPV, and NUTS code are consistently populated and logical. The 'planning' status and 'pre-market engagement' context explain the absence of 'Type' and 'Procedure' definitions. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly include green procurement or social criteria. However, it demonstrates a strong focus on technological innovation, automation, efficiency, and scalability, which contribute to operational sustainability and long-term value. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement or social criteria