Legal Compliance75/100
The tender appears generally compliant with standard procurement principles, featuring a clear procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and no reported disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date and some empty procedural codes are minor compliance gaps.
•Missing reveal date
•Empty procedure/type codes
Clarity60/100
While the description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear and detailed, the critical omission of specific evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100
Basic information, financial details, and contract duration are well-defined. However, the tender is incomplete due to the crucial absence of detailed evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for a comprehensive bid submission.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness45/100
The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the lack of transparent evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand the basis of award. Furthermore, the absence of electronic submission creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access and modern procurement practices.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality60/100
The tender outlines a clear contract start date and duration. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the procuring entity in 2026.
Data Consistency80/100
Key data fields are largely populated and consistent, with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for the liable person and specific procedure codes.
•Empty fields for liable person and procedure codes
Sustainability70/100
The tender explicitly integrates strong environmental considerations, such as low-emission vehicles and Net Zero goals, and implies innovation through its digital platform requirements. However, it lacks explicit social criteria.
•No explicit social criteria