Legal Compliance100/100
The use of an Open Procedure for an Open Framework is a standard and legally sound approach. However, the provided extract lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, which are typically integral to procurement regulations. The absence of actual tender documents makes it impossible to verify full compliance with national and EU procurement directives.
•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract.
•Absence of specific financial requirements in the provided extract.
Clarity40/100
The overall description of the service, including target groups and scope (home care, reablement), is clear. However, without the full tender documents, the clarity of crucial elements such as detailed service specifications, evaluation criteria, contractual terms, and precise submission instructions cannot be assessed.
•Lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
•Absence of full tender documents to assess clarity of service specifications, contractual terms, and detailed submission instructions.
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant weakness. The tender information is highly incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential elements such as detailed service specifications, comprehensive evaluation criteria, full terms and conditions, pricing schedules, and detailed instructions for bidders are entirely missing.
•No tender documents attached or available.
•Missing detailed service specifications.
Fairness60/100
The Open Procedure for an Open Framework generally promotes fairness by allowing broad market access. The high-level requirements, as extracted, do not immediately suggest tailoring for a specific company. However, the critical absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to ensure fairness, as the actual evaluation process could become subjective or favor incumbents if not clearly defined and transparently applied.
•Lack of detailed evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessment.
•Absence of full tender documents to ensure all bidders have equal access to comprehensive information.
Practicality40/100
The concept of an Open Framework for home care services is practical for managing ongoing demand. However, the practicality for potential bidders is severely compromised by the complete lack of tender documents. Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive, competitive, and compliant bid based solely on the high-level extracted requirements.
•Bidders cannot prepare a comprehensive bid without full tender documents.
•Lack of detailed information makes it impractical for potential suppliers to accurately assess the scope, risks, and resource requirements.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is internally consistent. The description aligns with the extracted requirements. The explanation regarding the change in procedure from a Competitive Flexible Procedure to an Open Procedure for an Open Framework demonstrates transparency in process changes.
Sustainability25/100
The explicit mention of 'Social Criteria' is a positive indicator for sustainability. However, without the actual tender documents, it is impossible to assess the depth, specificity, and enforceability of these criteria. There is no explicit mention of environmental or innovation criteria in the provided extract.
•Lack of detailed information on the 'Social Criteria' mentioned.
•Absence of explicit environmental or innovation criteria in the provided extract.