Request for Quote: Musical Groups & Workshop Providers - Fenland & Huntingdonshire (June-July 2026)

This tender for musical groups and workshop providers is generally clear and well-described, particularly regarding the service requirements and target audience. However, it suffers from significant deficiencies in completeness and fairness due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the tender lacks explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, and while a 6-day submission period might be acceptable for a below-threshold RFQ, it is on the shorter side for best practice.

The service description, requirements for providers, and submission information are very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are also comprehensive. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly detracts from the overall clarity of the procurement process.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. Requirements are defined, and documents are available. The primary gap is the missing evaluation criteria, which is a critical component for a complete tender package.

The requirements appear generic and not tailored, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and objectivity. The absence of e-submission creates barriers to equal access, and the short submission deadline may hinder adequate preparation for potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids practical planning. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, there are minor inconsistencies such as missing codes for the procedure type, an empty 'Liable Person' field, and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' when the estimated value is clearly disclosed.

The tender includes a strong social aspect by specifically targeting services for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND). However, it lacks explicit green procurement criteria, innovation focus, or indication of EU funding, which often drives higher sustainability standards.