Supply of new passenger minibuses for Limbaži Municipality

This tender for new passenger minibuses demonstrates good procedural clarity and data consistency, supported by e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by the non-disclosure of the estimated value and a complete absence of sustainability considerations.

The tender follows an open procedure and indicates WTO/GPA compliance, suggesting adherence to legal frameworks. No disputes are reported. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, while potentially not a strict legal breach for national tenders below EU thresholds, represents a transparency deficit that could be considered a minor legal best practice concern.

The tender title, description, and performance conditions are clear. AI summaries indicate that detailed requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are comprehensively documented in the 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' documents, ensuring clarity for bidders.

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, procedure type, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Key documents are referenced. The primary deficiency is the non-disclosure of the estimated value, which is a crucial piece of information for potential bidders.

The open procedure, e-procurement characteristic, and reasonable submission deadline contribute positively to fairness. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value significantly impacts transparency and could disadvantage bidders by hindering their ability to assess market competitiveness. While documents are available, potential 'restricted access' (e.g., no direct URLs) could present minor access hurdles.

The tender supports e-procurement, which is a significant practical advantage for bidders. Contract duration is specified. Minor practical drawbacks include the absence of an explicit contract start date and the potential lack of direct document URLs, requiring navigation within the e-procurement system.

The core tender data, including dates, status, and counts, is logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The only missing key field is the estimated value, which is a gap rather than an inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This represents a missed opportunity for more responsible procurement.