Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly states it's conducted via the 'Light Touch Regime' as set out in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015) and refers to mandatory exclusion grounds from PCR 2015. This indicates an intention to comply with relevant procurement legislation. The use of a DPV under the Light Touch Regime is a valid procedure for social and health services.
Clarity40/100
The description of the DPV, its purpose, the lot structure, and the general expectations (innovation, integrated service) are clearly articulated. The distinction between DPV application and mini-competitions is also clear. However, the absence of actual tender documents (SQ, specifications) means the detailed requirements and evaluation criteria are not available, leading to significant ambiguity for potential bidders.
•Lack of detailed specifications and evaluation criteria due to missing documents.
•The mention of an initial SQ deadline (16th April 2021) for 'initial mini-competitions' might cause confusion if not properly contextualized within the DPV's ongoing nature, though it is consistent with an active DPV.
Completeness83/100
The basic information, description, and high-level requirements are provided. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the explicit statement 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available.' This means essential documents like the Selection Questionnaire (SQ), full service specifications, terms and conditions, and detailed evaluation criteria are missing from the provided information.
•Absence of all tender documents (e.g., Selection Questionnaire, full specifications, terms and conditions).
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria for both DPV admission and subsequent mini-competitions.
Fairness80/100
The DPV structure itself, being open for new suppliers to join throughout its duration, generally promotes fairness and market access. The division into four lots also allows for specialization. However, the complete lack of accessible tender documents (SQ, specifications, evaluation criteria) severely undermines fairness, as potential bidders cannot fully understand the requirements or how they will be assessed, creating an uneven playing field. There is no indication of requirements being tailored to a specific company based on the provided text.
•Lack of transparency and equal access to information due to missing tender documents.
•Absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the objectivity and fairness of the selection process.
Practicality40/100
The DPV model is practical for dynamic markets like supported living services, allowing for flexibility and continuous market engagement. The lot structure is also practical for addressing diverse needs. However, the absence of documents makes it impractical for a supplier to prepare a compliant and competitive submission. The mention of 'up to 6 weeks' for initial evaluation is a reasonable timeframe for a DPV.
•Suppliers cannot practically prepare a submission without access to the Selection Questionnaire and detailed specifications.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is largely consistent. The DPV start date (around 8th June 2021) and the overall submission deadline (7th June 2026) align with a DPV operating for five years with an option to extend. The mention of an earlier SQ deadline (16th April 2021) for 'initial mini-competitions' is consistent with a DPV that has been active for some time, and new suppliers can join until the overall deadline.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly lists 'Social Criteria' as a procurement characteristic and emphasizes 'improved delivery of individual's outcomes' and 'enhanced partnership working' across health, social care, and voluntary agencies. This indicates a strong focus on social sustainability and integrated care within the service provision.
•The automated check flags 'Not green procurement,' indicating a lack of explicit environmental sustainability criteria. While the focus is social, a comprehensive sustainability approach would ideally include environmental aspects.