Legal Compliance75/100
The tender, being a Pre-Market Engagement (RFI), has some flexibility, but the absence of a defined 'Type' and 'Procedure' is a notable omission. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. The missing reveal date also impacts transparency.
•Missing procedure type and code
•Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100
The description is very clear, providing excellent context for the RFI's purpose and the underlying NHS Job Evaluation Schemes. AI-extracted requirements are well-articulated and understandable. While evaluation criteria are not specified, this is typical for an RFI.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are all provided. Requirements are clearly outlined, and documents are available. However, the 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields are empty, and formal evaluation criteria are absent, which reduces overall completeness from a tender perspective.
•Missing procedure type and code
•Missing liable person information
Fairness85/100
The tender provides full document access and discloses the estimated value, promoting transparency. The technical requirements are generic and do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant barrier to equal access and efficiency for potential market participants.
•No electronic submission supported
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for respondents. Document URLs are implied but not explicitly provided.
•No electronic submission supported
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency90/100
Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The status 'planning' aligns with a Pre-Market Engagement. The primary inconsistencies lie in the unpopulated 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields.
•Inconsistent population of 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields
Sustainability50/100
The tender inherently addresses significant social aspects by aiming to ensure fair pay and compliance with the Equality Act 2010, and it has a clear innovation focus through the development of a new digital system. However, there are no explicit green procurement or broader environmental considerations mentioned.
•No explicit green procurement criteria