United Kingdom179 days leftOpen

Malden Manor Primary School Catering Tender

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Inner London - East, United Kingdom

VALUE

£1,080,000

DEADLINE

July 31, 2026 at 23:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

55524000

REFERENCE

002178-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Malden Manor Primary School is tendering their catering service looking for professional catering suppliers to manage their school catering service.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided information. Bidders should be aware of standard public procurement exclusion criteria.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a professional catering supplier.
  • Be eligible to participate in a Restricted procurement procedure.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate capability to manage and deliver school catering services.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum annual turnover, specific financial ratios) are explicitly stated in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a request to participate by April 24, 2026.
  • Submit a final tender bid by 2026-07-31 23:00:00, if invited to the second stage of the Restricted procedure.
  • Propose services for a contract duration of 36 months.
  • Propose services for school catering (CPV category).
  • Adhere to the Restricted procurement procedure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002178-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
Malden Manor Primary School is tendering their catering service through a restricted procurement, seeking professional catering suppliers to manage their school catering with an estimated value of £900,000 over 3-5 years, requiring requests to participate by April 24, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of core documentation and detailed requirements, posing significant risks to fairness, transparency, and effective competition. The lack of essential information makes it impractical for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals and for the contracting authority to conduct a robust evaluation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender outlines a Restricted procedure and implicitly refers to standard exclusion grounds. However, the absence of explicit details for eligibility, technical, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, makes it difficult to assess full compliance with public procurement principles. The lack of any tender documents is a fundamental compliance risk.

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria for both selection and award stages.
Lack of detailed legal requirements in the provided extract, beyond basic eligibility.
Clarity40/100

While basic information like title, reference, and description is clear, the detailed requirements are extremely vague or entirely missing. This severe lack of clarity will significantly hinder potential bidders from understanding the exact scope, expectations, and how their bids will be assessed, leading to uncertainty and potential misinterpretations.

Vague eligibility requirements (e.g., 'Be a professional catering supplier' without further definition).
Absence of specific technical capability details or performance requirements.
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any tender documents, detailed technical specifications, specific financial requirements, and especially comprehensive evaluation criteria, means essential information for bidders is missing. This level of incompleteness is a major impediment to a fair and competitive process.

No tender documents attached, which should contain all detailed instructions and specifications.
Missing detailed technical specifications for the catering service.
Fairness60/100

The extreme lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk to fairness and equal treatment. Without clear, objective criteria, the contracting authority has excessive discretion, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions, subjective interpretations, and undermining the principle of equal treatment of bidders. The Restricted procedure specifically requires clear selection criteria for inviting bidders to the second stage, which are absent.

Absence of clear, objective selection criteria for the Restricted procedure's first stage.
Lack of evaluation criteria for the award stage, risking arbitrary decision-making.
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, preparing a competitive, compliant, and well-informed bid is highly impractical due to the severe lack of information. From the contracting authority's perspective, managing a fair, transparent, and defensible evaluation process without defined criteria will be extremely challenging and prone to disputes and legal challenges.

Bidders cannot effectively prepare proposals without detailed specifications, scope of work, and evaluation criteria.
Contracting authority faces significant challenges in conducting a transparent and defensible evaluation without defined criteria and comprehensive documentation.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided basic data (title, reference, organization, value, duration, CPV) is internally consistent. However, the limited scope of detailed requirements makes a comprehensive consistency check across all tender aspects difficult.

Sustainability0/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus in the provided tender information. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations, which are increasingly important in modern public procurement.

No green procurement criteria specified.
No social criteria included (e.g., fair labor, local sourcing).

Strengths

Has a clear title, reference number, and specified organization.
Description of the service is provided.
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed.
CPV code is provided for classification.

Concerns

Critical absence of any tender documents.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria for both selection and award stages.
Vague and incomplete eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Significant risk to fairness and transparency due to lack of detailed criteria.
No sustainability or innovation considerations included.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, clear evaluation criteria (selection and award), and full contract terms.
2. Clearly define all eligibility, technical, and financial requirements with objective, measurable, and proportionate criteria.
3. Integrate relevant sustainability (e.g., environmental, social) and innovation criteria into the tender to promote broader public value.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
67/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes