Audio Visual Services and Corporate Events (Provision of)

This tender for AV services provides a clear description of the required services and basic contract details, but suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed estimated value.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately and shows no disputes. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value represent significant transparency gaps that could impact legal compliance regarding fair and transparent procurement principles. The 'UK supplier' requirement, while potentially permissible for below-threshold tenders, is restrictive.

The description of the required AV services and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermines the overall clarity of the tender process, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, and a 'Page not found' error for one of the listed documents, indicating incomplete documentation access.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which introduces subjectivity into the assessment process. The undisclosed estimated value hinders fair bid preparation, and the 'UK supplier' requirement is restrictive, limiting competition. Furthermore, the absence of e-submission and a 'Page not found' document reduce equal access and transparency.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities and the issue with accessing one of the tender documents ('Page not found') present practical hurdles for potential bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency regarding dates and the absence of disputes or suspensions. However, several key fields, such as the liable person, specific procedure codes, and the estimated value, are either empty or not disclosed, indicating some data quality gaps.

The tender completely lacks any explicit mention or integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a missed opportunity to incorporate sustainability principles into the procurement process.