Passive Acoustic Monitoring Equipment

This tender presents a clear environmental objective and well-defined technical requirements, but it suffers from significant gaps in crucial procurement documentation, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the missing reveal date and empty procedure codes represent minor compliance and transparency gaps.

The description of the Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) units and their technical requirements is clear and specific. Nevertheless, the explicit absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and especially evaluation criteria significantly diminishes overall clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information, financial details, and duration are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specified mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for a comprehensive and fair bidding process.

The tender's fairness is significantly compromised by the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access. The technical requirements, while specific, do not appear overtly tailored to a single company without further context.

The absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clear, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided.

Key dates and financial information are consistent and logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and procedure codes are missing, indicating minor data gaps rather than inconsistencies.

Despite the tender's environmental purpose (biodiversity monitoring), the procurement itself does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation criteria for the equipment or the supplier's practices, representing a missed opportunity for sustainable procurement.