QQ25/023 Provision of an Infrastructure Delivery Plan

This tender is clear and incorporates social value, but it presents significant deficiencies in document accessibility and legal compliance.

Mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated as not provided, which is a significant legal compliance issue. Additionally, procedure codes are missing, the liable person field is empty, and critical documents are inaccessible, raising concerns about full adherence to procurement regulations.

The description of the required service is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, including technical capabilities and evaluation criteria (price, quality, social value), are well-documented and understandable from the AI-extracted information.

While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, two critical 'Attachment' documents are inaccessible ('Page not found'). This significantly impacts the completeness of the tender documentation available to potential bidders.

The inaccessibility of key tender documents creates an unfair bidding environment as not all information is equally available. The absence of an electronic submission option also limits equal access for potential bidders. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

The lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Furthermore, the inaccessibility of tender documents makes it impractical for bidders to fully prepare and submit a comprehensive proposal.

Dates are logical and consistent. However, the 'Liable Person' field and procedure codes are unpopulated, indicating minor data inconsistencies. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender explicitly includes social value as an evaluation criterion (5%), which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific focus on green procurement or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability profile.