Legal Compliance50/100
The tender has significant legal compliance gaps, primarily due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental requirement for transparent and fair procurement. The lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary and the missing reveal date also contribute to lower compliance.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided in summary
Clarity50/100
While the project description and work packages are exceptionally clear and detailed, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes the tender fundamentally unclear for potential bidders. Without knowing how proposals will be assessed, bidders cannot effectively formulate their submissions.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No explicit eligibility requirements for bidding company
Completeness55/100
The tender provides essential basic information, deadlines, value, and duration, and documents are available. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and explicit eligibility/exclusion requirements represents a significant gap in the completeness of the tender documentation.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No explicit eligibility requirements for bidding company
Fairness30/100
The tender supports e-procurement, discloses value, and its technical requirements appear generic. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw that severely undermines fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis on which their proposals will be judged.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality90/100
The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission via a dedicated portal with clear URLs. The contract start date and duration are well-defined, facilitating bidder planning and response.
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for procedure types and an empty 'Liable Person' field, but these do not create contradictions.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•Missing codes for procedure type
Sustainability70/100
The project's core objective of reducing energy consumption and improving efficiency for rolling stock is inherently aligned with environmental sustainability. However, the tender documentation itself does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement criteria or social aspects for bidders.
•No explicit green procurement criteria for bidders
•No social aspects mentioned