Purchase of C1800CH Super- heavy duty flail collector

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies, primarily stemming from the explicit specification of a single brand and model, which severely compromises fairness and legal compliance. The inaccessibility of multiple core tender documents further exacerbates issues related to completeness, clarity, and practicality, making it challenging for potential bidders to participate effectively.

The explicit naming of a specific brand and model ('Ryetec C1800CH Super') without justification or 'or equivalent' is a significant breach of procurement principles. Furthermore, the 'Page not found' errors for multiple core documents, including the Tender Notice, indicate a failure to meet mandatory disclosure and accessibility requirements.

While the specific product requested is clear, the tender lacks clarity regarding evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and eligibility requirements. The inaccessibility of key documents further hinders overall clarity for potential bidders.

The tender is critically incomplete due to multiple core documents being inaccessible ('Page not found' or 'Download failed' for the Tender Notice and several attachments). Crucially, evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and eligibility requirements are also missing from the provided summaries.

The tender explicitly specifies a single brand and model ('Ryetec C1800CH Super'), which severely restricts competition and indicates potential tailoring. The absence of evaluation criteria, lack of full document access, and no e-submission further undermine the fairness and transparency of the process.

The lack of electronic submission support creates a practical barrier. More critically, the inaccessibility of multiple core tender documents makes it practically impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer.

The basic structured data fields (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, CPV, NUTS) are consistently populated and logically ordered. There are no indicated disputes or suspensions.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.