Legal Compliance75/100
As a Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) notice, the absence of a formal procedure type is consistent with its pre-procurement status. The PME itself is a legally sound practice for market consultation. CPV codes are correctly assigned, and there are no disputes.
Clarity80/100
The description of the planned framework, proposed lots, and the purpose of the market engagement event is very clear. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect that formal tender requirements are not yet specified, which is appropriate for a PME.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, contract duration, and start date are provided. While the estimated value is not disclosed and formal tender requirements are absent, this is largely expected for a PME. All listed documents are available and summarized.
•Estimated value is not disclosed (classified).
Fairness85/100
The PME actively promotes fairness by engaging the market early and seeking feedback to inform the tender development. Eligibility requirements for participation are generic, ensuring broad access. The classified value is a minor transparency concern.
•Estimated value is not disclosed (classified).
Practicality65/100
The online market engagement event is a practical approach for gathering feedback. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details for the *future* formal tender and the classified value present some practical limitations for potential bidders.
•No explicit e-submission details for the future formal tender.
•Estimated value is not disclosed (classified).
Data Consistency90/100
The data is largely consistent, with dates being logical and no disputes or suspensions. The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being 'None' are consistent with its PME status. The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
•Liable Person field is empty.
Sustainability50/100
While the 'Short Breaks Services' inherently address significant social needs, the PME notice itself does not explicitly outline green procurement, social criteria for suppliers, or innovation focus as part of the procurement process.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit innovation focus.