Cleaning of Saeima building premises

This tender for Saeima building cleaning services presents a mixed quality assessment, with good procedural aspects but significant concerns regarding transparency, fairness, and completeness due to restricted document access, undisclosed value, and missing evaluation criteria.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, uses an appropriate CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission deadline. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' are significant legal compliance issues concerning transparency and equal treatment, impacting the overall score.

The service description, location details, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines the clarity of the procurement process for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how bids will be assessed.

Basic information, detailed location, and numerous supporting documents are provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, restricted access to documents, and the crucial omission of evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components of a comprehensive tender.

While e-procurement is enabled and the submission deadline is reasonable, the tender suffers from major fairness issues. Restricted document access, the undisclosed estimated value, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromise transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. However, the lack of a specified contract start date, the undisclosed estimated value, and the general restriction on document access reduce the practicality for bidders to fully prepare and submit informed proposals.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are minor contradictions between the automated check results and the tender's basic information (e.g., e-procurement, green procurement), but the core data provided is largely consistent, apart from the missing estimated value.

The tender explicitly includes green procurement requirements, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded, limiting its overall sustainability scope.