Supply of promotional goods for Mārupe Municipality

This tender for representation goods demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, with clearly defined requirements and an objective evaluation criterion. However, the critical issue of restricted document access significantly compromises legal compliance, completeness, and fairness, hindering equal opportunity for bidders.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, uses an appropriate CPV code, and has no disputes. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, as it directly impacts transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental principles of public procurement law.

The description of the procurement subject is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. The evaluation criterion (lowest price without VAT) is specified in the document summaries, resolving the initial automated flag of 'No evaluation criteria specified'. Performance conditions are clearly referenced.

All basic information, financial details, timeline, and duration are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. However, the 'Restricted document access' means that while documents are listed, their full content is not accessible, which constitutes a significant gap in completeness for potential bidders.

The estimated value is disclosed, the evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price), and e-procurement is indicated. However, 'Restricted document access' is a critical fairness issue, as it prevents all potential bidders from having equal access to essential tender information, potentially favoring certain parties.

Electronic submission is indicated through 'E-Procurement' characteristics and 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma' as the opening place. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of explicit document URLs (implied by restricted access) and no specific contract start date are minor practical drawbacks.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. While there were initial contradictions regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission, these were resolved by deeper analysis of the document summaries. The 'Restricted document access' remains a consistency issue in terms of transparency versus the listing of documents.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.