Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines itself as a PME, not a formal procurement process, which aligns with its 'None' procedure type. Deadlines are reasonable for a PME, and CPV codes are appropriate. While not subject to full procurement regulations, it adheres to transparency principles. The generic 'Type: None' could be more descriptive if a PME-specific type existed.
•The 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are generic ('None') rather than explicitly stating 'Preliminary Market Engagement' as a recognized procedure type in the system, though the description clarifies this.
Clarity90/100
The description is exceptionally clear and unambiguous, explicitly stating that this is a PME and not a formal procurement. Requirements for PME participation are well-documented and understandable, with explicit notes on what is not applicable at this stage (e.g., evaluation criteria).
Completeness80/100
The PME provides all essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration. While the estimated value is not disclosed, this is acceptable for a PME where scope and budget are still being defined. Documents are attached and accessible.
•Estimated value is not disclosed, which, while acceptable for a PME, limits market understanding.
Fairness95/100
Fairness is a strong point, with full document access and explicit statements that participation is voluntary, at own cost, and will not confer any advantage in a potential future procurement. The use of an e-tendering system ensures equal access, and requirements are generic for market engagement.
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the provided e-tendering system URL, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the lack of financing information (estimated value) is a minor practical limitation for potential participants.
•Financing information (estimated value) is not available.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are generally populated and consistent. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'Type: None' is consistent with the PME's nature as described.
•The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
Sustainability30/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the PME documentation. While this is common for early-stage market engagement, it represents a missed opportunity to signal future priorities.
•No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.