Pieriga, Latvia
€4,437,000
February 19, 2026 at 09:00
Other
163543
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for Zeltiņu street reconstruction demonstrates good foundational information and a clear evaluation criterion, but suffers from significant clarity issues in its summarized requirements and critical practical concerns regarding document access and electronic submission.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission deadline is reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are noted. While the AI-extracted requirements are vague on mandatory exclusion grounds, the presence of 'Nolikumus' and detailed part requirements suggests compliance within the full documentation. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a concern for full legal verification by bidders.
The project description is clear, and performance conditions refer to available documents. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are specified in the detailed part requirements. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is significantly vague, stating 'No specific...' for eligibility, technical, and financial criteria, which severely impacts the clarity of the provided summary information.
All basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. A comprehensive list of 17 documents, including regulations, technical specifications, and financial forms, suggests the full tender package is complete. The issue with AI-extracted requirements is more about summarization clarity than overall document completeness.
The estimated value is disclosed, and evaluation criteria are objective. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a major concern for fairness. Furthermore, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' issue, if the latter is true, represents a significant barrier to equal access and fair competition.
The contract duration is specified. However, the potential lack of e-submission (as flagged by automated checks, contradicting 'E-Procurement') is a significant practical drawback. 'Restricted document access' also poses a practical challenge for bidders. A specific contract start date is not provided.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' issue flagged by automated checks. There is also a minor contradiction between the 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag and the explicit 'lowest price' criteria in document summaries.
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes