Technical Provision for Events

This tender for event technical provision is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but faces significant concerns regarding restricted document access which impacts fairness and completeness. While basic information is robust, the lack of full transparency on documents is a notable drawback.

The tender defines a clear open procedure with a reasonable submission deadline. Basic legal requirements appear to be met, and no disputes are indicated. However, the CPV code (51313000) seems slightly misaligned with 'Technical provision of events', and the flagged 'Restricted document access' could pose a challenge to full compliance with transparency principles.

The tender's description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referencing specific documents for details on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria. Evaluation criteria are indicated as specified within the documents, contributing to overall clarity.

All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined across the listed documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag significantly impacts the completeness from a bidder's perspective, as full documentation is crucial for a comprehensive bid.

The tender benefits from an open procedure, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines. E-procurement is indicated, promoting equal access. However, the critical issue of 'Restricted document access' severely undermines fairness, as bidders cannot fully review all terms and conditions, potentially creating an uneven playing field. While requirements appear generic, this cannot be fully verified without full document access.

Electronic submission is indicated as supported, which is a positive for practicality. The duration of the contract is specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and the 'Restricted document access' could make it impractical for bidders to easily obtain all necessary files.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While there are minor discrepancies between automated checks and AI summaries (e.g., e-submission, evaluation criteria), the core tender data itself is largely consistent.

The tender does not explicitly include criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. Therefore, its contribution to sustainability objectives is minimal.