Kingsway Tunnel Embankment Stabilisation - Outbound Road

This tender presents a clear project description and technical requirements but suffers from significant gaps in crucial documentation and evaluation criteria, impacting overall transparency and fairness. While basic information is well-provided, the absence of key legal and procedural details is a notable concern.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns CPV codes correctly. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, along with the failure to access the main 'Tender Notice' document, raises concerns regarding full compliance with procurement regulations.

The project description and technical capability requirements are exceptionally clear and detailed. However, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the absence of full financial and exclusion requirements significantly reduce the overall clarity of the bidding process.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code is complete. However, the critical 'Tender Notice' document failed to download, and essential details like mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are missing from the provided summaries.

The estimated value is disclosed, and e-procurement is supported, which promotes equal access. However, the failure to provide the main 'Tender Notice' document and the explicit absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fairness for potential bidders.

Electronic submission via the Proactis portal is supported, and key contract dates are clearly defined. Nevertheless, the inability to access the main 'Tender Notice' document poses a significant practical hurdle for interested parties.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency is the empty 'Liable Person' field.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as core criteria. While Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) might lead to innovative solutions, it's not framed as a sustainability focus.