Legal Compliance100/100
Legal compliance is severely compromised by the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, clear eligibility criteria, and any specified evaluation criteria. This lack of detail makes the tender vulnerable to legal challenge and arbitrary decision-making.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
•Vague eligibility requirement ('competent Service Provider').
Clarity40/100
While the general scope of services is described, the tender lacks critical clarity regarding the specific assets, locations, and expected pricing structure due to the complete absence of referenced schedules and documents. This makes it impossible for bidders to understand the full extent of the work.
•Referenced Schedules 1, 2 & 3 (Asset List & Pricing Document, Site List) are missing.
•Eligibility criteria 'competent Service Provider' is vague.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. All essential supporting documents, including asset lists, site lists, pricing documents, and detailed instructions for bidders, are entirely absent. Furthermore, there are no specified financial requirements or evaluation criteria.
•No documents attached (Schedules 1, 2 & 3 are critical).
•Missing financial requirements.
Fairness60/100
The complete absence of detailed eligibility, selection, and award criteria, coupled with missing essential documents, severely undermines the fairness of the procurement process. It creates an environment where decisions could be subjective and non-transparent, potentially favoring pre-selected bidders.
•Absence of clear eligibility and selection criteria.
•Missing evaluation criteria for award.
Practicality40/100
It is practically impossible for any bidder to prepare a meaningful and compliant offer based on the information provided. The absence of asset lists, site lists, and pricing documents means bidders cannot accurately scope the work or formulate a competitive price.
•Bidders cannot accurately scope the work without asset and site lists.
•Impossible to formulate a competitive price without pricing documents.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided text is internally consistent, but its consistency with the actual procurement process is questionable given the complete absence of all referenced external documents. The tender refers to schedules that are not provided.
•Tender description and requirements refer to Schedules 1, 2 & 3 which are entirely missing.
Sustainability0/100
There is no indication that sustainability, green procurement, social criteria, or innovation aspects have been considered or integrated into this tender.
•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.