Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the provided information lacks a clear publication/reveal date for the tender, which is a minor transparency issue.
•Missing tender publication/reveal date in the provided information
Clarity60/100
The description of the required solution and its purpose is clear and understandable. However, the full requirements refer to Section 2 of the ITT, which is not provided, and critically, explicit evaluation criteria are missing, significantly reducing the clarity for bidders.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria
•Full requirements refer to ITT Section 2, which is not provided
Completeness50/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadline, value, and duration are present. However, the critical Invitation to Tender (ITT) document containing detailed requirements and specifications is missing, as are the evaluation criteria.
•Missing full Invitation to Tender (ITT) document
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness40/100
Electronic submission is supported, and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and the unavailability of the full ITT document significantly hinder the transparency and fairness of the tender, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Full Invitation to Tender (ITT) document not directly accessible
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, a direct document URL is not provided in the basic information (though implied to be on PCS), and the contract start date is not known, which are minor inconveniences.
•Missing direct document URL in provided information
•Contract start date not known
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and the data is logical. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing procedure codes.
•Field 'Liable Person' is empty
•Procedure codes are not populated
Sustainability30/100
The tender lacks explicit references to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which are important considerations in modern procurement practices.
•Missing green procurement criteria
•Missing social criteria