Vidzeme, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 16, 2026 at 09:00
Other
163916
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for laboratory furniture demonstrates good clarity and defined requirements, but is significantly hampered by critical data inconsistencies, particularly a past contract signing date, and potential issues with document access and missing key financial and duration details.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. It is EU-funded, suggesting adherence to higher standards. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag, if it applies to bidders, poses a significant legal compliance risk regarding transparency and equal access to information. The non-disclosure of the estimated value is also a minor transparency concern.
The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects, divided into two parts. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated, providing clear guidance for bidders.
Basic information, requirements, and location details are provided. However, the estimated value of the procurement is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for bidders to fully assess the scope and commitment.
The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is objective and transparent. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a major concern, as it could prevent equal access to essential tender documents, severely impacting fairness. The non-disclosure of the estimated value also reduces transparency for potential bidders.
The tender indicates EU funding and likely supports e-procurement. However, the statement that 'The contract will be signed no earlier than 10.03.2025' is a critical error, as this date is in the past relative to today's date (2026-01-30), making the timeline impractical and confusing. The absence of a clear contract duration also hinders practical planning.
Key dates for reveal, submission, and opening are logically consistent. There are no reported disputes. Nevertheless, the specified contract signing date (10.03.2025) is severely inconsistent with the current date (2026-01-30), indicating a significant error in the tender documentation.
The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, but it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its requirements.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes