Engagement Activities & Interventions- Southwark - Lot 1-5

This tender exhibits moderate quality with significant deficiencies in clarity, completeness, and fairness, primarily due to the absence of critical evaluation criteria and detailed requirements. While basic information is present, key procedural and transparency elements are lacking.

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type and CPV code, and there are no reported disputes. However, the provided summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are crucial for legal compliance. The missing reveal date is also a procedural oversight.

The service description is clear and unambiguous. However, the tender suffers from a significant lack of clarity regarding evaluation criteria, which are not specified. Furthermore, detailed eligibility, financial standing, and performance conditions are not clearly outlined in the provided summary, making it difficult for bidders to understand the full scope of requirements and assessment methods.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and location is adequately provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific eligibility requirements, financial standing requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. While documents are listed, their summaries indicate these essential details are not readily available.

The tender's fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which hinders transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission capabilities also creates a barrier to equal access for potential bidders. While the estimated value is disclosed and technical requirements appear generic, these critical omissions undermine the principle of fair competition.

The tender provides clear information on contract duration and start date. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, though documents are stated as available.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and dates are logical. The primary consistency issue lies in the varying level of detail, with critical requirements and criteria being absent from the provided summaries.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects (beyond the inherent nature of the service), or innovation focus in its criteria or requirements. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage public procurement for broader sustainability goals.