External Audit Services

This tender for external audit services is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a defined scope. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are reported. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of services is clear, referencing specific parts of the ITT for scope and pricing. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The reference to an ITT with multiple parts (B and E) suggests detailed documentation is available, but the content of these documents is not directly accessible or summarized here. The number of attached documents is stated, but their content is not detailed.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned. The process appears objective, with no indication of tailored requirements for specific companies. Access to the full ITT via a link is provided.

The tender provides a URL to access the full notice and ITT. However, it does not explicitly state an e-submission process, which could be a significant practical hurdle. Financing information is not detailed, and while the contract start date is given, the lack of explicit e-submission is a concern.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any inconsistencies. No suspension or disputes are reported, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.