Acquisition of plastinated veterinary anatomy models for LBTU's needs

This tender demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, utilizing an open e-procurement procedure. However, the critical issue of restricted document access significantly undermines its fairness, completeness, and overall legal compliance.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, assigns an appropriate CPV code, and shows no disputes. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and compliance with public procurement principles, impacting the score.

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements, including exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria, are well-defined and refer to specific documents. The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is explicitly stated.

All essential metadata such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and location are provided. While documents are listed and summarized, the 'Restricted document access' means the full tender documentation is not available to bidders, making it incomplete from a practical perspective.

The tender benefits from a disclosed value, reasonable submission period, objective 'lowest price' evaluation criterion, and e-procurement. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw that severely compromises equal access to information and thus the fairness of the competition.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is specified. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and, more importantly, the 'Restricted document access' significantly hinder the practicality for potential bidders to prepare and submit a compliant offer.

The core tender data, including basic information, timeline, and classification, is internally consistent. Key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Automated flags regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission contradict the provided content but are external observations.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.