Appointment of Independent Member / Chair of the Dyfed Pension Fund Pension Board

This tender for an Independent Member/Chair of the Dyfed Pension Fund Pension Board provides clear role requirements and essential information, but suffers from a critical lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. It references relevant national regulations (LGPS Governance Regulations 2015). However, the absence of a specified reveal date and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information are minor compliance gaps.

The description of the specialized role and the technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders regarding how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location are well-provided. While documents are available, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds indicates a significant gap in the comprehensive details required for a complete tender package.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides reasonable time for submission. The requirements, while specialized, are justifiable for the role and do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, impacting fairness. The lack of electronic submission also presents a barrier to equal access.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information is available. The primary practical drawback is the absence of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement processes.

The core data fields, including dates, values, and descriptions, are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and specific procedure/type codes, as well as the missing reveal date.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is a common characteristic for highly specialized service roles of this nature, but it indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations.