Construction supervision of sorted waste collection sites

This tender for construction supervision services exhibits significant concerns regarding fairness and transparency due to restricted document access and an unrealistic estimated value of 0.01 EUR, despite otherwise clear basic information and EU funding.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes correctly, and the timeline is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' for an open procedure and the highly unrealistic estimated value of 0.01 EUR raise serious concerns about compliance with transparency and fair competition principles under EU/national procurement regulations.

The tender title and description are clear. Requirements are stated to be detailed in specific documents. However, the conflicting information regarding the presence of evaluation criteria (AI summary vs. automated flag) introduces a degree of ambiguity.

Basic information, deadlines, and location are provided. While documents are listed, the 'Restricted document access' means the tender is not fully complete for public review. The 0.01 EUR estimated value also renders the financial scope effectively incomplete or misleading.

The 'Restricted document access' and the extremely low estimated value of 0.01 EUR are critical issues that severely undermine the fairness and transparency of this 'open' procedure. These factors strongly suggest potential tailoring for a specific company or a lack of genuine competition.

The tender supports e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. However, the 'Restricted document access' significantly impedes potential bidders from practically accessing and preparing their submissions. The lack of an explicit contract start date is a minor drawback.

While most basic data fields are populated, there are significant inconsistencies. The 'Restricted document access' contradicts the 'open' procedure type. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic conflicts with the 'No e-submission' automated flag. Most critically, the 0.01 EUR estimated value is highly inconsistent with the nature of construction supervision services.

The project itself (sorted waste collection sites) has an inherent environmental benefit. However, the tender documents for the supervision services do not explicitly include green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, as indicated by automated checks. While EU funded, this doesn't automatically translate to specific sustainability requirements within the tender itself.