Supply of sewing equipment and household electrical appliances for the "Design and Technologies" subject at Alojas Auseklis Primary School

This tender for sewing equipment and household appliances demonstrates good structural organization with clear requirements divided into parts, but is significantly hampered by an undisclosed estimated value and contradictory information regarding document access and evaluation criteria.

The tender generally adheres to legal frameworks, being an open EU-funded procedure with a reasonable submission period. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the flagged 'Restricted document access' are notable concerns regarding transparency and accessibility.

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-structured by parts. Evaluation criteria, including economic advantageousness and electricity consumption for Part 3, are explicitly mentioned in the document summaries, despite contradictory automated flags.

While essential information like title, organization, and deadlines are present, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting the overall completeness of the tender information.

The undisclosed estimated value and the flagged 'Restricted document access' pose significant challenges to ensuring full transparency and equal access for all potential bidders. However, evaluation criteria appear objective, and no evidence of tailored requirements is present.

Electronic submission is indicated, and the contract duration is specified. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and the flagged 'Restricted document access' could introduce practical difficulties for bidders.

There are significant contradictions between the automated check results/issues and the document summaries, particularly concerning the presence of evaluation criteria and e-submission capabilities. The NUTS code also has a minor geographical discrepancy.

The tender includes a specific green procurement aspect by considering electricity consumption as an evaluation criterion for Part 3. While broader social or innovation criteria are not explicitly detailed, its EU-funded status suggests adherence to higher standards.