Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and a minor discrepancy in the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP in documents) are areas for improvement.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned
•Minor discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs. GBP)
Clarity60/100
The project description and technical capability requirements are well-detailed and clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly reducing clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Most basic information, including title, organization, description, value, and duration, is provided. However, the tender explicitly states no specific financial requirements and lacks evaluation criteria. One listed document is a 'Page not found' error, indicating incomplete access to information.
•No specific financial requirements stated
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100
The tender's value is disclosed, and the submission period is adequate. However, restricting eligibility to UK-based SME/VCSE and single contractors significantly limits competition. The absence of e-submission and, critically, evaluation criteria, compromises transparency and equal access.
•Eligibility restricted to UK-based SME/VCSE and single contractors
•No e-submission supported
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The 'Page not found' document also indicates a practical issue with accessing all tender information.
•No electronic submission supported
•One tender document is a 'Page not found' error
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency exists between the estimated value stated in EUR and a document summary mentioning a GBP equivalent.
•Liable Person field is empty
•Minor inconsistency in estimated value currency (EUR vs. GBP)
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It appears to be a purely functional procurement without broader sustainability considerations.
•No green procurement aspects
•No social criteria