Legal Compliance100/100
The tender specifies an 'open competition' below threshold, which is appropriate for the estimated value. It correctly references statutory requirements like F-Gas regulations and health and safety legislation. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text is a notable omission.
•Absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text.
Clarity40/100
The description of the required services, including routine servicing frequency, emergency call-out response times, and types of properties, is clear and well-defined. The instructions for accessing the e-procurement portal are also explicit. However, the general reference to 'British and EU standards' lacks specific detail, and how 'commitment to sustainability and high-quality service delivery' will be assessed is not clear.
•Lack of specific technical standards beyond general 'British and EU standards'.
•Unclear methodology for evaluating 'commitment to sustainability and high-quality service delivery'.
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant area of concern. The tender information provided is essentially a description, with 'No documents attached' and 'No document content available'. Crucially, detailed evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements (beyond the estimated value), and full tender specifications are missing, making it impossible for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.
•Absence of full tender documents and detailed specifications.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria and their weighting.
Fairness60/100
The 'open competition' procedure promotes broad participation. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria and comprehensive tender documents creates an uneven playing field, as bidders lack the necessary information to formulate truly competitive and compliant bids. While requirements like 'experience in similar contracts' and 'working on listed or historic buildings' are legitimate, their specific definition and evaluation are critical for fairness, which is currently unclear.
•Lack of detailed evaluation criteria and comprehensive tender documents hinders fair competition.
Practicality40/100
The operational requirements, such as 24/7, 365-day coverage with a 4-hour response time, are demanding but typical for critical maintenance services. The use of an e-procurement portal is a practical approach for managing submissions. The contract duration with extension options offers good long-term stability.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the description and extracted requirements appears consistent. There are no conflicting statements or data points.
Sustainability0/100
The tender mentions 'commitment to sustainability' as a technical capability requirement. However, it lacks specific, measurable sustainability criteria or explicit green procurement elements, which limits its effectiveness in promoting environmental objectives.
•Lack of specific, measurable sustainability criteria or evaluation weighting.