Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears to follow an open procedure and mentions mandatory exclusion grounds. However, the absence of full tender documents and specified evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with transparency, equal treatment, and legal requirements for a complete procurement process.
•Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Absence of full tender documents, which are legally required for bidders to prepare compliant offers.
Clarity40/100
The description of the works and the division into geographical lots is reasonably clear. The technical capability requirements are also well-defined in terms of scope. However, the critical absence of full tender documents means crucial details for bidders, such as specific technical specifications, contractual terms, and procedural instructions, are entirely unclear.
•Absence of full tender documents means specific technical specifications, contractual terms, and procedural instructions are unclear.
•Financial requirements are not specified, leading to ambiguity for bidders.
Completeness83/100
This is the weakest aspect of the tender. It is critically incomplete due to the absence of any attached documents, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria. This makes it impossible for potential bidders to submit a comprehensive and compliant offer.
•No tender documents attached or available.
•Financial requirements are entirely missing.
Fairness60/100
The absence of full tender documents, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria creates a highly unfair bidding environment. Bidders cannot prepare competitive offers without this essential information, and the lack of transparent evaluation criteria undermines the principle of equal treatment.
•Lack of evaluation criteria prevents fair and transparent assessment of bids.
•Absence of full tender documents creates an uneven playing field, as bidders lack essential information.
Practicality40/100
The tender's practical execution is severely hampered by the lack of essential documentation. Bidders cannot practically prepare a compliant bid without knowing the full scope, terms, financial expectations, and evaluation methodology. The broad scope of works across multiple disciplines and two lots might limit participation to larger, more established firms.
•Bidders cannot practically prepare a compliant bid without access to full tender documents, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria.
•The broad scope of works (external, internal, responsive, void) across two lots requires significant operational capacity and diverse expertise, which might limit participation to larger firms.
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the provided extracted information, there are no direct inconsistencies. However, the critical lack of full documentation means there is insufficient data to thoroughly assess consistency across all tender elements.
•Insufficient data to fully assess consistency due to missing documents and detailed requirements.
Sustainability0/100
No information regarding environmental, social, or innovation criteria is provided. The automated check also flags the absence of green procurement, social criteria, and innovation focus, indicating a complete lack of sustainability considerations.
•No green procurement criteria specified.
•No social criteria specified.