Legal Compliance50/100
The tender suffers from critical legal compliance issues, primarily the unavailability of the 'Tender Questionnaire' which is marked as required, and the explicit absence of evaluation criteria. While the procedure type and CPV codes are correctly defined, these fundamental omissions are significant.
•Required 'Tender Questionnaire' document is 'Page not found'.
•No evaluation criteria specified, despite being referenced in Q&A.
Clarity60/100
The project description, background, and technical requirements are generally clear and well-articulated. However, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria, despite repeated references to them in the Q&A, creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.
•Evaluation criteria are not specified, making it unclear how proposals will be judged.
Completeness50/100
While basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the unavailability of essential documents, particularly the 'Tender Questionnaire', and the absence of evaluation criteria. This prevents bidders from having all necessary information to submit a comprehensive bid.
•Required 'Tender Questionnaire' document is unavailable.
•Evaluation criteria are missing.
Fairness45/100
Fairness is severely compromised by the lack of full document access (required forms are missing) and the complete absence of transparent evaluation criteria. Bidders cannot prepare competitive and compliant proposals without knowing the full requirements or how they will be judged. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access.
•No full document access for required submission forms.
•Evaluation criteria are not objective or transparent as they are missing.
Practicality50/100
The tender faces significant practical challenges due to the 'Page not found' error for required documents, which creates a major barrier for bidders. The absence of electronic submission further complicates the process for potential contractors.
•Required documents are inaccessible ('Page not found').
•No electronic submission supported.
Data Consistency70/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. However, there is a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 2 months' and the 'Installation: October 2026' timeline, given a 'Contract Start: 2026-06-30'. This requires clarification.
•Inconsistency between 'Contract Duration' and 'Installation' timeline.
Sustainability75/100
The tender demonstrates a good focus on social sustainability through requirements for DDA compliant and PIPA-principled inclusive play equipment. It also includes some green aspects like 'natural look equipment' and retaining/planting trees. However, it lacks explicit innovation focus or broader environmental/social criteria.
•No explicit innovation focus.
•Not EU funded (often associated with higher sustainability standards).