Legal Compliance100/100
Significant legal compliance issues are evident due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, which are standard legal obligations in public procurement.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned
•No explicit financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels)
Clarity40/100
The general description of services is clear, but the specific requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are vague and lack the necessary detail for bidders to understand what is truly expected. The CPV code is also misleading.
•Vague eligibility and technical capability requirements
•CPV code 'Generators' is too narrow and potentially misleading for general plant hire services
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete as no tender documents are attached or available, rendering it unworkable for potential suppliers. Essential information such as detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and comprehensive evaluation criteria is entirely missing.
•No tender documents attached or available
•Missing detailed specifications and terms and conditions
Fairness60/100
The absence of evaluation criteria and detailed requirements creates a significant risk to fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand how their submissions will be assessed. The restriction to a maximum of two suppliers may also limit competition.
•Absence of explicit evaluation criteria compromises fairness and transparency
•Maximum of two suppliers may unduly restrict competition for a 4-year framework
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, the tender is impractical to respond to due to the lack of any supporting documents or detailed requirements. From the contracting authority's perspective, the lack of financial and legal requirements poses significant risks.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare a submission without tender documents
•Lack of financial requirements poses a risk to the contracting authority regarding supplier solvency
Data Consistency100/100
There is an inconsistency between the broad description of 'plant hire' and the narrow CPV code 'Generators'. Otherwise, the limited data provided is internally consistent.
•Inconsistency between broad service description and narrow CPV code ('Generators')
Sustainability0/100
No information regarding environmental, social, or innovation criteria is provided, indicating a missed opportunity to incorporate sustainability objectives into the procurement.
•No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned