Brand Guardianship

This tender presents a clear description of services and supports electronic submission, but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, indicating compliance with basic legal frameworks. However, the reveal date is missing, which is a minor transparency concern.

The description of services and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are provided, and documents are available via a portal. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the fundamental omission of evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a comprehensive bid submission.

The tender supports e-procurement and its requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness, as it prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions.

Electronic submission is supported via the eTendering portal, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. While the estimated value is provided, more detailed financing information (e.g., payment terms) is not available in the summary, which could affect practical planning.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include the 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes.

The tender mentions 'innovation' as a core service aspect, which is a positive. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or social aspects, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.