Tenders

21034 Home to School and Social Care Transport Dynamic Purchasing System 2021

Open
Deadline
181 days left
August 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
021441-2021
Value
£300,000,000
Location
East of England, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

August 31, 2021

Deadline for Questions

August 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£300,000,000
Duration
60 months
Location
East of England
Type
Other
71
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This DPS is for delivery of home to school and social care transport services. This transport will be for a range of client groups including (but not limited to), pupils (to/from mainstream and special educational needs establishments), children’s social care service users and adult social care service users. These services will be for Cambridgeshire County Council and Peterborough City Council primarily, though other local authorities and public bodies within Cambridgeshire may also access services. This solution shall offer one Platform to service providers to bid for work for Home to School transport services both mainstream and SEND, Children's social care and Adult social care transport services across the County. The estimated value of the DPS is approximately £30million per annum, thus representing a total potential value of £300,000,000 over the maximum ten year term.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Access full procurement details and submit applications for DPS admission via the ProContract platform.
--Submit bids for specific work packages through the designated "one Platform" once admitted to the DPS.
--Adhere to the submission deadline for DPS admission applications, which is 2026-08-30 22:55:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information. Bidders should refer to the full procurement documents on the ProContract platform for these details.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Be a service provider capable of delivering home to school and social care transport services.
--Be able to service a range of client groups, including pupils (mainstream and special educational needs), children’s social care service users, and adult social care service users.
--Be able to operate primarily within Cambridgeshire County Council and Peterborough City Council areas, and potentially other local authorities and public bodies within Cambridgeshire.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Demonstrate capability to deliver home to school transport services for mainstream pupils.
--Demonstrate capability to deliver home to school transport services for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) pupils.
--Demonstrate capability to deliver children's social care transport services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum annual turnover, specific financial ratios) are detailed in the provided tender information. Bidders should refer to the full procurement documents on the ProContract platform for these details.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
021441-2021_official.pdf

This document is a formal contract notice for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) by Cambridgeshire and Peterborough City Councils for home-to-school and social care transport services, directing interested parties to the ProContract platform for full procurement details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

The provided tender information for this large-scale Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is highly incomplete, lacking crucial details on mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria. While the scope and purpose are clear, the absence of core procurement documents makes a comprehensive assessment of fairness and compliance impossible.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender refers to a "Restricted procedure" but describes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), which is an open procedure. The absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided extract raises concerns regarding full legal compliance without access to the complete documentation.

Procedural ambiguity: "Restricted procedure" vs. Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Clarity40/100

The service scope, client groups, and geographical area are clearly defined. However, the requirements sections are presented at a very high level, lacking specific criteria. The overall clarity is severely hampered by the absence of the full tender documents.

Requirements are stated as categories rather than specific, measurable criteria.
Inconsistency in contract duration (60 months vs. 10-year DPS term).
Completeness83/100

This is the primary weakness. The provided information is severely incomplete, explicitly stating that critical details like mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are missing and require reference to external documents not provided. No documents are attached.

No attached tender documents.
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness80/100

Without the full tender documents, especially specific financial and technical requirements and evaluation criteria, a complete assessment of fairness is not possible. The broad nature of the requirements as presented, combined with the lack of detail, creates a risk of subjective assessment.

Lack of specific evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment.
Potential for tailoring cannot be fully assessed without detailed requirements.
Practicality40/100

The use of a DPS is practical for managing diverse transport services over time, allowing continuous market entry. The requirement to use a specific platform (ProContract) is standard. However, the lack of detailed requirements in the provided extract makes it challenging for bidders to prepare adequately.

Bidders cannot adequately prepare without full documentation.
Data Consistency100/100

There is an inconsistency between the stated "Contract Duration: 60 months" and the "maximum ten year term" for the DPS. The "Restricted procedure" type also conflicts with the open nature of a DPS.

Inconsistency between "Contract Duration: 60 months" and "maximum ten year term" for the DPS.
Inconsistency between "Type: Restricted" / "Procedure: Restricted procedure" and the open nature of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
Sustainability25/100

The explicit mention of "Social Criteria" is a positive aspect. However, without the full documents, the specific depth or requirements related to these criteria, or the inclusion of environmental (green) aspects, cannot be determined.

Lack of detail on specific social criteria.
No explicit mention of environmental (green) criteria.

Strengths

Clear definition of service scope and client groups.
Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for flexibility and continuous market access.
Explicit mention of "Social Criteria" in procurement characteristics.
Large estimated value indicates significant opportunity for suppliers.
Clear geographical scope (Cambridgeshire/Peterborough).

Concerns

Severe incompleteness due to missing tender documents and critical requirement details (exclusion grounds, financial, evaluation criteria).
Inconsistency between "Restricted procedure" and "Dynamic Purchasing System" (DPS).
Lack of specific, measurable requirements for eligibility and technical capability.
Inconsistency in stated contract/DPS duration (60 months vs. 10 years).
Absence of NUTS code, though geographical area is described.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all full tender documents, including detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and comprehensive evaluation criteria, are readily available on the ProContract platform.
2. Clarify the procedural type, explicitly stating that while the initial setup might follow a restricted-like process for admission, the DPS itself operates as an open system.
3. Harmonize the stated contract duration with the overall DPS term to avoid confusion for potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline