Installation of lift and all associated works in Grade II* Listed Building

This tender provides essential project details and technical requirements for a specialized construction project, but significantly lacks specified evaluation criteria and detailed legal/financial requirements in the summary, impacting transparency and fairness.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date, and critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion, and eligibility grounds in the provided summaries, represent significant compliance gaps.

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and specific, particularly regarding the Grade II* Listed Building context. However, the overall clarity is severely hampered by the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed financial, exclusion, and eligibility requirements in the provided summaries.

Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration are well-defined, and all five tender documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the provided summaries.

While full document access and value disclosure contribute positively to fairness, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access.

The tender provides a clear contract start date and duration, and documents are accessible via a link. However, the absence of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Key dates and the tender status are consistent, and there are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type (Code)', 'Procedure (Code)', and a missing reveal date, but these do not critically undermine the overall data integrity.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to align the procurement with broader sustainability objectives.