Gas Services Support Framework – North East

This tender provides clear basic information but suffers from significant gaps in crucial details such as evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements, impacting its overall quality and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is a legal oversight, and the reveal date is missing, which could impact transparency.

The service description is clear and understandable. However, the AI-extracted requirements are high-level, and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit financial requirements, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and the crucial absence of evaluation criteria.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of e-submission also slightly impacts equal access.

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, though documents are available.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for procedure type and the absence of a 'Liable Person' field.

The tender explicitly lacks any mention or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations.